One door in

The Futureworth Assessment.

$8,500   Three weeks. A score, a gap analysis, and a roadmap with named owners. Choose the version that matches the question keeping you up.

Secure AI Assessment

The question it answers. Are you spending on the AI that matters, and is it safe?

A use-case-to-value gap analysis across your business. Your top five AI opportunities ranked by return, complexity, and risk. A Placement Map for each one showing which workflow steps need a model, which stay rules-based, and which stay human. A secure deployment path that moves each use case from shadow mode to supervised to production, in that order, so trust is earned before autonomy is granted.

Scored with the Enterprise AI Trust Score. Every result lands in one of three buckets. Revenue uplift. Risk mitigation. Cost savings.

Cyber Resilience Assessment

The question it answers. Are we spending on the right threats?

A threat-to-spend gap analysis that treats security as a capital allocation problem, not a technical one. A prioritized resilience roadmap. The 72-Hour IR Executive Playbook, the hour-by-hour leadership guide for the first three days of an incident.

Scored with the AI Threat Readiness Score. Overspend gets named. Blind spots get owners.

How it works

Week 1

Guided questionnaire on your schedule. Three to five leadership interviews, 45 minutes each.

Week 2

Scoring and gap analysis against the framework baselines. No black box. Method shown in the report.

Week 3

Live 60-minute executive readout. Written report within three business days. Fifteen pages, no padding.

Then

You own the roadmap either way. If you want oversight, the retainer exists. If not, the exit is clean.

What the output looks like

A score you can defend, category by category. Each gap gets a baseline, a named owner, and a cost of inaction. The readout is 60 minutes and never longer.

Illustrative sample
Enterprise AI Trust ScoreQ3 baseline
58/100
Use-case value71
Deployment security44
Governance52
Workforce readiness63
Every category below target gets a gap analysis, a named owner, and a projected re-score. This is what the readout looks like.
Illustrative sample
The Placement Map · one workflow, ten steps
Intake
Validate
Classify
Route
Draft
Exception
Review
Summarize
Log
Notify
Model (3 of 10) Deterministic rules Human stays
In a typical ten-step workflow only a few steps need a model. Paying for AI everywhere else is how budgets burn.
A note on method. Our assessments are advisory evaluations built on structured leadership input and guided self-reporting. We install no software. We access no systems. We run no scans. That is deliberate. It means no procurement cycle, no security review to engage us, and no vendor with an agenda inside your network.

Who this is for

Companies between $10M and $50M in revenue whose leadership will participate. The CEO or CFO attends the readout or the engagement waits. If that sounds heavy, we are not your firm. If it sounds like how decisions should get made, start below.

Start the intake

Five fields, one screen. Payment before kickoff.

Need only the Texas answer? The TRAIGA Readiness Review.

The Texas Responsible AI Governance Act took effect January 1, 2026, and almost nobody is explaining what it requires of a company your size. This is a scored gap review against the act's requirements. $6,000, two-week turnaround, advisory only. If the review shows deeper misallocation, it credits the conversation that follows.